new jail utility is available. announcement.
Adam Vande More
amvandemore at gmail.com
Thu Jul 22 01:16:55 UTC 2010
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 4:52 AM, Aiza <aiza21 at comclark.com> wrote:
>
> Not yet, when I have a spare box I might, although I quite like using
>> zfs for jails as you can limit the disk usage dynamically per zfs
>> filesystem and I didnt see any support there yet, even basic support
>> like there is with ezjail would be nice.
>>
>>
> Zfs was left out because its over kill. Sparse image jails gives the same
> protection at a 10th of the overhead.
You didn't factor in slowness due to having a file-backed filesystem. While
probably pretty low, it's definitely there and not good in an io heavy
jail. Also, the host will have to mount a UFS based FS, and cache it so
you're going to have increased memory usage.
Ideal setup for an io intensive jaill(eg database) is to be bound to
compressed ZFS file-system, not a sparse image located on such a setup.
I'm not sure what overhead you're referring too. If it's hard to tie into
your application, you are probably correct, but from a host perspective you
are increasing overhead.
There are advantages to sparse or raw file as well, it would be nice to have
a choice.
--
Adam Vande More
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list