Same priority pf/altq queues not supported?

[krad]

On 3 July 2010 00:05, Maxim Khitrov <mkhitrov at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> I'm configuring pf on FreeBSD 7.3 and would like to use the following
> altq settings:
>
> altq on $ext priq bandwidth 9240Kb queue {low, red, med, top}
> altq on {$int1, $int2, $srv} priq bandwidth 100Mb queue {low, red, med,
> top}
>
> queue low priority 1 priq(default)  # Default priority queue
> queue red priority 1 priq(red)      # Default priority TCP queue with RED
> queue med priority 2                # DNS, DHCP, ACKs, and TOS == lowdelay
> queue top priority 3                # ICMP, NTP
>
> When I try to load these settings, I get the following errors:
>
> pfctl: low and red have the same priority
> pfctl: low and red have the same priority
> pfctl: low and red have the same priority
> pfctl: low and red have the same priority
> /etc/pf.conf:79: errors in queue definition
>
> OpenBSD 4.1 documentation states that "if two or more queues are
> assigned the same priority then those queues are processed in a
> round-robin fashion." Is there any specific reason why this behavior
> was altered in the FreeBSD port?
>
> I'm not really sure of what to do, because I don't want to prioritize
> or deprioritize TCP traffic, and I can't have RED enabled for any
> other protocol. If you have any other general-purpose queuing
> suggestions, please let me know.
>
> - Max
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>

check the version of pf in freebsd compared to openbsd, as they are not
always in sync