"Invalid partition table" after installation (GOOD NEWS!)

Tim Judd tajudd at gmail.com
Sat Jan 23 02:34:49 UTC 2010


> OK - my current best theory is that if the Standard boot manager
> is faced with anything other than exactly 1 bootable slice (partition
> to it), it defaults to "Invalid partition table."  I'll bet anyone
> lunch that this is true.  Any takers?

I've read before:
  the standard bootloader looks for the first freebsd slice, and runs
it.  If there's no bsdlabel partition 'a' then it will have trouble

I haven't followed this thread in detail.

I briefly saw you had 3 slices defined, is by chance the first slice a
<non>system disk?

> I'll test my theory tonight and let you all know how it turns out.
> If this is true, then we should at least post some warnings, if not
> actually fix the installation process so that if you choose "Standard,"
> it helps ensure that you have one and only one bootable slice/partition!
> Whaddaya think?
> Well, better it happen to me than someone from another community who is
> trying us out for the first time...
> --
> John Lind
> john at starfire.MN.ORG
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"

More information about the freebsd-questions mailing list