Dislike the way port conflicts are handled now

[Pav Lucistnik]

Greg Larkin píše v so 16. 01. 2010 v 18:02 -0500:

> Here is the original post:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-questions@freebsd.org/msg227363.html

I will agree that `portupgrade -o` is way too useful feature.
I'd vote for reverting to the old behaviour.

> I thought portmgr might have some insight into additional reasons for
> making the change, such as fixing a problem with pointyhat builds, etc.
>  At the moment, I'm neutral on the change, since it hasn't caused me any
> grief, but I did some research for the folks who posted the original
> questions.

It was done because someone thought it is a good idea and submitted a PR
about it.

-- 
Pav Lucistnik <pav at oook.cz>
              <pav at FreeBSD.org>
I can't do that, that would make sense.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: Toto je =?UTF-8?Q?digit=C3=A1ln=C4=9B?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=C4=8D=C3=A1st?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?=
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20100117/128bb191/attachment.pgp