ISO image size -regarding
jhelfman at e-e.com
Sat Jan 9 01:18:47 UTC 2010
I am uncertain as to why the difference with the changes you had made,
and the size it returned, however I would suggest following the release
engineering process for creating a custom release.
In doing this process, I am sure you find it is a much cleaner process,
and more close in size to what you may expect.
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 04:41:24PM -0800, Knight Tiger thus spake:
>I am trying to create a custom ISO image of FreeBSD 6.4. The only
>difference between the release ISO and this custom image is a modified
>driver (amdsmb.ko). I did not create the new driver. I believe it was
>backported from a later release.
>I understand that this is not a backport of the driver but a hack but
>the ISO size surprises me.
>The steps I had followed (listed below) resulted in an ISO image of
>around 1 GB while the original ISO image is around 600 MB. The new
>image work boots fine but I am not sure why it is huge
>// mount the release ISO
># mdconfig -a -t vnode -f 6.4-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso -u 0
># mount_cd9660 /dev/acd0 /mnt
># mkdir custom
># cd custom
>// copy iso files to custom
># rsync -a /mnt .
># scp scott at remote:/boot/kernel/amdsmb.ko boot/kernel/.
>// wrap up in a ISO
># cd ..
>#mkisofs -R -b boot/cdboot -no-emul-boot -o custom.iso custom
>The ISO file is created successfully but is huge. I mounted it in
>VirtualBox and boots just fine. I was able to install the OS (although
>I have not checked the functionality of amdsmb changes yet)
>I looked up information on creating custom ISO images but they had all
>involved rebuilding the kernel while I am not sure if I need to do the
>same Any leads is appreciated.
>freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
More information about the freebsd-questions