binutils problem? WAS [Re: static linking error: ELF binary type "0" not known. Exec format error. Binary file not executable.]

Anton Shterenlikht mexas at bristol.ac.uk
Sat Dec 18 15:23:16 UTC 2010


On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 06:58:50PM +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> On Monday 06 December 2010 16:16:30 Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 02:06:22PM +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> >> On Monday 29 November 2010 14:04:16 Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> >>> ----- Forwarded message from Marcel Moolenaar <xcllnt at mac.com> -----
> >>>> On Nov 10, 2010, at 5:32 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> >>>>> [ia64]
> >>>>> ia64% file a.out 
> >>>>> a.out: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, IA-64, version 1 (SYSV), statically
> >>>>> linked, not stripped
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> [amd64]
> >>>>> amd64% file a.out 
> >>>>> a.out: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (FreeBSD),
> >>>>> statically linked, for FreeBSD 9.0 (900023), not stripped
> >>>> 
> >>>> The branding on ia64 is wrong. The executable is not marked as being
> >>>> a FreeBSD executable. It's declared as SYSV, whereas on amd64 it's
> >>>> properly declared as FreeBSD.
> >>>> 
> >>>> This is a binutils problem.
> >>>
> >>> Anybody here can explain better what Marcel meant
> >>> by "binutils problem", and how to fix it?
> >>> 
> >>> I've binutils-2.20.1_3 installed from devel/binutils.
> >> 
> >> As a workaround you could manually brand the executable:
> >> brandelf -f 9 a.out
> > 
> > this works fine.
> 
> A fix has been committed to CURRENT, 8-STABLE and 7-STABLE. You should
> no longer have to brand executables manually.

yes, just checked, many thanks.
anton



-- 
Anton Shterenlikht
Room 2.6, Queen's Building
Mech Eng Dept
Bristol University
University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK
Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944
Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423


More information about the freebsd-questions mailing list