Effing HAL

[Freminlins]

2009/10/30 Adam Vande More <amvandemore at gmail.com>

>
> No my point was top is not accurate measure of HAL's memory usage.  HAL has
> shared library's just like many other applications.
>

Yep, I know all about that. But it is indicative. And indeed born out by the
fact that when HAL is not running I get 18MB more memory free.

This is only because of your misinterpretation of data and failure to RTFM.
>

Not entirely true. I didn't misinterpret the data - it was accurate. I
didn't read the FM, but then again if HAL worked as it is meant to, I
shouldn't need to. Isn't that the whole point of HAL? Starting X and finding
no keyboard or mouse working is hardly what I would call success.


> Adam Vande More
>


MF.