Why is sendmail is part of the system and not a package?
Walter Venable
weaseal at gmail.com
Wed Oct 28 13:31:28 UTC 2009
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 1:43 AM, Bernt Hansson <bernt at bah.homeip.net> wrote:
>
>
> Lars Eighner said the following on 2009-10-28 05:46:
>>
>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2009, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:24:38 -0500 (CDT), Lars Eighner
>>> <luvbeastie at larseighner.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Evidently by making it necessary to learn yet another scripting
>>>> language to configure it. Other than personal profit I cannot see why
>>>> people are clinging like grim death to something this fubar. Really,
>>>> let's go past this one more time:
>>>>
>>>> "Sure, sendmail.cf is hard to work with so the solution is you learn
>>>> m4!"
>>>>
>>>> Did you look at the link he offered? How helpful is that?
>>>>
>>>> Beside which, m4 is a PORT. So if sendmail is not configurable
>>>> without a port, why isn't it a port?
>>>
>>> Can we go back to our regular hacking, please? m4 is not a port:
>>>
>>> $ which m4
>>> /usr/bin/m4
>>
>> I wonder how that happened,
>
> Too much alcohol?
Really? See /usr/src/usr.bin/m4/Makefile
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list