best FBSD version for commercial use.
danger at FreeBSD.org
Sun Oct 11 23:02:33 UTC 2009
Nerius Landys wrote:
>>> My 2 cents, as far as I know 7.1 will be maintained longer than 7.2
>>> according to the freebsd.org website. That is, security fixes will be
>>> rolled out for 7.1 a while after 7.2 reaches End Of Life. That made
>>> me decide to go with 7.1 when I had to make the switch from 7.0 a few
>>> months ago. 8.0 was not out at that time.
>> I don't think that is correct. There must be something unclear there.
> Near the bottom of the page mentioned above, there is a table.
> RELENG_7_1 EoL is January 31, 2011, RELENG_7_2 EoL is May 31, 2010
> according to the chart. That is a difference of 8 months.
All of these seems to be correct, but it needs a little note. The last
version from the X-STABLE branch gets the Extended lifetime support. 7.2
is definitely not the latest release from the stable/7 branch, and that
is the reason why it has shorter support life time. There, however, will
be at least 7.3 which will potentially get longer support. And upgrading
to 7.3 from 7.2 will surely not be a big deal. If you read the mentioned
web page more carefully, you will see the following paragraph:
Selected releases (normally every second release plus the last release
from each -STABLE branch) will be supported by the Security Officer for
a minimum of 24 months after the release, and for sufficient additional
time (if needed) to ensure that there is a newer Extended release for at
least 3 months before the older Extended release expires.
S pozdravom / Best regards
Daniel Gerzo, FreeBSD committer
More information about the freebsd-questions