Secure unsalted or fixed salt symmetric encryption?
rsmith at xs4all.nl
Mon May 25 21:52:07 UTC 2009
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 10:06:01PM +0100, RW wrote:
> On Mon, 25 May 2009 21:00:39 +0200
> Roland Smith <rsmith at xs4all.nl> wrote:
> > Or you can use the -nosalt option. But as explained in
> > [http://www.openssl.org/docs/apps/enc.html], using a random salt by
> > default is a design decision because: "Without the -salt option it is
> > possible to perform efficient dictionary attacks on the password".
> > That doesn't sound good, does it?
> It's not a problem since she's using a random key file, not a weak
But a key alone is not sufficient. You'll need to specify an
initialization vector as well, using the -iv option. E.g.:
openssl enc -aes256 -in <infile> -out <outfile>.aes \
-K 971001EE50DCDBCAF3F521851E773B0285838CA549E2258C1A195565D61F2145 \
If you try it with only a key or keyfile, you'll get a 'iv undefined'
error, resulting in a zero-length output file. :-(
If you use a password (-pass) you don't need an iv.
[plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated]
pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20090525/ae729ba7/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-questions