Reading warnings when installing multiple ports
jerrymc at msu.edu
Sat May 16 19:23:16 UTC 2009
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 11:24:42AM +0200, Mel Flynn wrote:
> On Friday 15 May 2009 19:26:00 mfv wrote:
> > On Tuesday 12 May 2009 13:53:35 Mel Flynn wrote:
> > > On Monday 11 May 2009 15:21:24 Jerry McAllister wrote:
> > > > But, I very often wish there was a convenient way to see some of those
> > > > messages and especially messages about things one has to do during
> > > > the install, such as manually installing something or getting some
> > > > license thing handled, before I start the port install.
> > > >
> > > > Sometimes I get a question in the middle of an install that I do not
> > > > know how to answer and it is an awfully inconvenient time to have
> > > > to start scrounging for information. Having a commannd that
> > > > would display all those things and maybe some related information
> > > > or pointers to information for making an intelligent response - before
> > > > starting the make - would be very helpful.
> > >
> > > Do you have specific examples? Cause I can't think of anything that falls
> > > under your description.
> > Hello All,
> > I had a recent experience with editors/openoffice.org-2. Based on past
> > experience I know that the compile would take a few hours. I started make
> > and left to do some chores. When I returned I discovered that the program
> > had aborted as I did not have java installed and had to download a patch
> > from the Sun website.
> This can and will not ever be fixed, because it's a legal and not a technical
> Once you know this, you know to install diablio-jdk first, which takes 5-10
> minutes pending download speed.
Yes, I know it is a legal/license issue at Sun and I sort of know to do
it now, having installed OO a couple of times. But, the point was and is,
it would help people if the information about having to do it would
come up right at the first, so a person could have it taken care of
instead of starting an install which one knows will take hours so
leaves to do something else and comes back and finds the install
stopped hours ago because of something that could have and should
have been taken care of before actually starting the install.
Some variation of this, often involving entering a 'y' or 'n' at
some point in the middle of an install that could have been done
causing an environmental variable or some such to be set ahead of
time exists in a number of ports I have installed. It is annoying
to come back from a bunch of tiring meetings only to see that an
install that could be finished has several more hours to run because
it was waiting all that time for a y or n.
Building that improvement into ports installs and some additional
why and wherefor information in the pkg-desc file or some other
useful and readily available place would help the ports system.
Of course, it would still be necessary to depend on the port
maintainer to provide these accurately and completely.
More information about the freebsd-questions