torrent client traffic shaping question
rwmaillists at googlemail.com
Thu Mar 12 06:36:33 PDT 2009
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 16:24:37 +1100 (EST)
Ian Smith <smithi at nimnet.asn.au> wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:42:23 +0000 RW <rwmaillists at googlemail.com>
> > A traffic shaper could efficiently regulate downloads by proxying
> > TCP. And even though PF does some limited TCP proxying,
> > unfortunately dummynet and altq work at the IP level.
> I don't know why you say 'unfortunately' here?
Because tcp is best controlled at the tcp-level You could get smoother,
lower-latency transfers, and you're not dropping any packets that
have already passed through the ISP bottleneck.
More information about the freebsd-questions