Best practices for securing SSH server

Erik Norgaard norgaard at locolomo.org
Wed Jun 24 13:53:33 UTC 2009


RW wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 22:37:12 +0200
> Erik Norgaard <norgaard at locolomo.org> wrote:
> 
>> You're right, as long as port-knocking as a first pass authentication 
>> scheme is not in wide spread use, then any attackers will not waste
>> time port-knocking. If ever port-knocking becomes common, attackers
>> will adapt and start knocking.
> 
> It would be fairly straightforward to prevent that by having a
> combination of knocking ports and secret guard ports. When a guard port
> gets hit the sequence is broken, and the source IP gets blocked for a
> while.

Great: Wouldn't that be the same as monitoring failed login attempts and 
temporarily blacklisting ips that repeatedly connect through standard 
methods?

Point remains: Adding port knocking does not solve any security problem, 
it only adds complexity, cost, points of failure, inconvenience etc 
while making your problem appear differently and leaving you with the 
illusion of being more secure.

BR, Erik
-- 
Erik Nørgaard
Ph: +34.666334818/+34.915211157                  http://www.locolomo.org


More information about the freebsd-questions mailing list