you're not going to believe this.
rsmith at xs4all.nl
Tue Jun 23 18:22:27 UTC 2009
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 07:23:22PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >> whatever.
> > Not so. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flash_file_system
> > Most flash devices sold as harddisks have hardware that emulates a
> > traditional harddisk, representing it as a (P/S)ATA block device. Unless
> > you can bypass this, there is no need for a special filesystem.
> yes this is exactly a problem. it emulates hard disk, which lowers
> performance much. for example wear leveling and emulation small
> blocks requires moving of data within flash, this lowers both performance
> and lifetime.
Even a flash filesystem will have to do wear levelling. And you'll have
to gather writes to minimize the (slow) wiping of eraseblocks. In other
words, you'll be doing more or less the same that current hardware
does. But then in software, which is generally slower than dedicated
The big difference is that it is much easier to tweak and change
algorithms when doing it in software.
[plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated]
pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20090623/4cf2fbf9/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-questions