off topic: unmanageable switch?
Jerry B. Altzman
jbaltz at gmail.com
Fri Jun 19 14:10:45 UTC 2009
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 06:22, Nikos Vassiliadis <nvass9573 at gmx.com> wrote:
> My list of priorities, with 1 being the most important.
> 1. Price
> 2. Stability
> 3. No "smart" features
> OK, this looks like a .1Q frame, let's drop it.
> This MAC address is active on many ports, let's drop it.
> 4. STP support
> Would be nice, just to prevent cabling errors.
> There is not gonna be deliberate use of duplicate
> links between the switches to increase availability.
Do you require Gigabit ethernet or no?
I've had very good experience with Netgear 24-port and 16-port rack mount
switches (not the desktop consumer models -- although they too have worked
well for me). They have somewhat more robust power supplies than the
standard wall-attach transformers, and the FastEthernet models can be had
for VERY cheap. (I bought a 24-port model a few years back for just about
I've had Netgear switches run without a problem for *years*.
Their managed switches, on the other hand, are a nightmare, and I wouldn't
use them again if I had the choice.
jerry b. altzman jbaltz at gmail.com www.jbaltz.com
foo mane padme hum
More information about the freebsd-questions