Ggatten at waddell.com
Wed Jun 3 18:57:34 UTC 2009
Yes, and that old urban legend, that Windows NT is "better" than VMS, so
the initials are one higher in each position - at least in my alphabet:
Lots of interesting little things between VMS and WNT.
PS: Sorry again for top posting - I'll try harder! Is this appropriate
topic for this list? ;-)
From: owner-freebsd-questions at freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions at freebsd.org] On Behalf Of David Kelly
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 1:49 PM
To: Wojciech Puchar
Cc: cpghost; Polytropon; freebsd-questions at freebsd.org; Glen Barber
Subject: Re: Open_Source
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 08:32:38PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >A counter-example is VMS. It is a commercial product, but highly
> >reliable and secure.
> At least is said too, i never used or even seen VMS.
When Digital Equipment Corporation collapsed, the architect(s) of VMS
went to Microsoft and were given NT to mold in their own likeness. This
is where rings of security levels originated in modern Windows.
NT 3.5 and possibly 4.0 supported VMS-like versioned files as part of
David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly at HiWAAY.net
Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad.
freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
<div style='border:none;border-bottom:double windowtext 2.25pt;padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in'>
"This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient
and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email
and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by
return email and delete this email from your system."
More information about the freebsd-questions