Can not set up two ADSL link to provider

[KES]

Здравствуйте, KES.

Вы писали 27 января 2009 г., 21:23:57:

K> Здравствуйте, Chuck.

K> Вы писали 27 января 2009 г., 1:57:10:

CS>> On Jan 26, 2009, at 3:34 PM, KES wrote:
>>> I can not setup two ADSL PPPoE Links to same provider.
>>> Because of imposibility to setup route for second connection
>>> First connection gets:
>>> ng0: flags=88d1<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,NOARP,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST>  
>>> metric 0 mtu 1492
>>>        inet 92.113.94.215 --> 195.5.5.203 netmask 0xffffffff
>>>
>>> Second can not be established because of:
>>> Jan 27 01:27:55 kes mpd: [UKR_B4] IFACE: Add address  
>>> 92.113.94.249/32->195.5.5.203 to ng1
>>> Jan 27 01:27:55 kes mpd: [UKR_B4] IFACE: Adding IPv4 address to ng1  
>>> failed: File exists

CS>> You should talk to your network provider and ask them whether they  
CS>> want you to do multilink PPP or IEEE 802.3ad link aggregation.  Either
CS>> way, the bonding of the two connections should give you a single  
CS>> virtual network interface (tunX for the first, probably, and laggX in
CS>> the second case) which has only a single route.

CS>> For example:
CS>> http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/erx/junose80/swconfig-physical/html/ethernet-config14.html

CS>> ...talks about "After you configure the LAG bundle, you can route IP  
CS>> traffic over it, create a VLAN over it, or route PPPoE traffic over it."

K> I do not want to aggregate links. I want use them as standalone
K> I had two servers, two lans and two ADSLs. Now I have one server, four
K> NICs: first LAN1, second LAN2, third ADSL1, forth ADSL2
K> I want to route LAN1 through ADSL1, LAN2 through ADSL2. LAN1/LAN2 must
K> not interact with each other. For each LAN I use its own FIB (routing
K> table).
K> Only one problem: I can not run setup two PPPoE link if for second
K> link is leased same gateway as for first

K> So, is it possible to workaround this problem?


In any case I is impossible to talk to my provider. It will change
nothing. This is country wide provider. They said: "if you can not
configure that on one machine then you must use two.. (((("

Also NOTICE: when I setup second PPPoE connection I setfib 1 (second
routing table). So route must be added to second routing table and
must not conflict with first, but it does


-- 
С уважением,
 KES                          mailto:kes-kes at yandex.ru