Root exploit for FreeBSD

[Rolf Nielsen]

Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
>> Are you sure that OpenBSD has a better record?
> 
> 
> I found this for loose reference.
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenBSD#Security_and_code_auditing
> 
> I will say that even though on the surface OpenBSD appears to have a
> better track record security wise
> I tend to use FreeBSD for my desktop needs because of things like
> Nvidia Graphics (esp now that there is amd64 support)

Where's that? The Nvidia site says nothing about it yet, and the 
makefile for x11/nvidia-driver still says ONLY_FOR_ARCHS=i386. I'm 
eagerly waiting for it, but I can't find anything other than a forum 
post (I don't have the address handy at this computer, but I know it's 
somewhere in the mailing list archive) from Zander at Nvidia corporation 
saying it's on its way.

> also wine works in FreeBSD and some of my clinets still run windows apps.
> 
> I find FreeBSD is the middle ground the world needs between Linix and OpenBSD
> 
> Sam Fourman Jr.
> Fourman Networks
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
> 
> 
>