which filrs/directories must be chowned bind?
krad
kraduk at googlemail.com
Sat Dec 5 22:34:49 UTC 2009
2009/12/5 Gary Kline <kline at thought.org>
> On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 10:09:24PM +0000, krad wrote:
> > 2009/12/5 Gary Kline <kline at thought.org>
> >
> > >
> > > I've just finished getting
> > >
> > > % nslookup 10.47.0.230
> > >
> > > to respond, so at least my test configuration is finally right
> > > ... or on the right track. I am not certain that I ever had
> > > things chowned bind:bind; even before my '07 meltdown. Now
> > > it's time to make certain that every file that should be owned
> > > by bind really *is*.
> > >
> > > Anybody?
> > >
> > >
> > Have a look at /etc/mtree/BIND.chroot.dist
> > also dont use nslookup use host or dig. NSlookup is dodgy
>
>
> Re nslookup, it is still widely enough used that it ain't dead
> yet. But, yeah, I just found a tutorial-like page on dig.
> It's helpful for a utility that isn't that friendly.
>
> thanks for the mtree tip.
>
> --
> Gary Kline kline at thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service
> Unix
> http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org
> The 7.31a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.php
>
>
it gives dodgy results under some conditions and is actually more clunky to
work with
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list