UFS2 or ZFS for 3TB disk?

[Wojciech Puchar]

.
.
lots of explanations how to make ZFS "stable" and usable deleted after 
reading.
.
.
>
> IMHO, you should be using ZFS for what you want to accomplish.  If you
> do go the UFS2 route, I would recommend you set background_fsck="no" in

definitely yes.

but UFS works fine on 10TB volume :) and works FAST.

just use larger blocks and fragments (like 4-8K fragment) and reduce inode 
numbers - without this fsck will take REALLY long.