arplookup 0.0.0.0 failed: host is not on local network

Jon Radel jon at radel.com
Thu May 15 12:25:47 UTC 2008


Christer Solskogen wrote:

> [root at shine ~]# tcpdump -vvv -n -l -e arp
> tcpdump: listening on nfe0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 
> bytes
> 08:58:46.337968 00:1d:60:36:34:a6 > ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff, ethertype ARP 
> (0x0806), length 60: arp who-has 192.168.0.3 tell 192.168.0.12
> 08:58:46.337974 00:18:f3:29:d8:15 > 00:1d:60:36:34:a6, ethertype ARP 
> (0x0806), length 42: arp reply 192.168.0.3 is-at 00:18:f3:29:d8:15
...snip...
> 
> There is this line saying:
> 00:1d:60:36:34:a6 > ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> and nothing has ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff as a mac address :)

ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff is the broadcast address.  That looks like a rather 
mundane arp request broadcast followed by a reply from the machine with 
the address in question.

The trick will be to see if you see anything with tcpdump at the time 
one of the syslog messages about 0.0.0.0 gets logged.

BTW, just for the record, personally I doubt this is anything serious to 
worry about, but as I have no real evidence for that feeling....  You 
may, however, find http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/0.0.0.0 at least mildly 
interesting.

--Jon Radel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3283 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20080515/2bb1ccb2/smime.bin


More information about the freebsd-questions mailing list