Problems upgrading GNUTLS 2.2.2 to 2.4.0
millenia2000 at hotmail.com
Thu Jun 26 16:22:33 UTC 2008
> Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:55:08 -0500> From: doug at polands.org> To: schiz0phrenic21 at gmail.com> CC: questions at freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Problems upgrading GNUTLS 2.2.2 to 2.4.0> > Schiz0 wrote:> > On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Doug Poland <doug at polands.org> wrote:> >> Hello,> >>> >> I'm having issues upgrading GNUTLS 2.2.2 to 2.4.0. The box in questions is> >> running 7.0-STABLE i386.> >>> >> The error message I'm receiving is...> >>> >>> >> ===> Configuring for gnutls-2.4.0> >> aclocal.m4:16: warning: this file was generated for autoconf 2.62.> >> You have another version of autoconf. It may work, but is not guaranteed> >> to.> >> If you have problems, you may need to regenerate the build system entirely.> >> To do so, use the procedure documented by the package, typically> >> `autoreconf'.> >> configure.in:28: version mismatch. This is Automake 1.10,> >> configure.in:28: but the definition used by this AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE> >> configure.in:28: comes from Automake 1.10.1. You should recreate> >> configure.in:28: aclocal.m4 with aclocal and run automake again.> >> *** Error code 63> >>> >> Stop in /usr/ports/security/gnutls.> >>> >> I've installed devel/autoconf-2.62 but it makes no difference. I've googled> >> and tried lots of things to get autoconf to run but to no avail.> >>> >> Any suggestions are appreciated.> >>> >> --> >> Regards,> >> Doug> > > > This isn't a solution, just an issue I had too.> > > > When I upgraded from 2.2.5 to 2.4.0, I also got that message about a> > version mis-match for Automake. However, this did not stop the build> > process, and it installed successfully.> > > Interesting... I'm unable to continue the build process because of the > error code. How did you get around it?> > -- > Regards,> Doug
My best guess would be to upgrade your automake to a version that's at least 1.10.1 like the message says which so happens to be the version that's in ports right now. upgrading autoconf prob wouldn't be bad either.
More information about the freebsd-questions