speeding up buildworld/kernel
Maxim Khitrov
mkhitrov at gmail.com
Fri Jan 25 16:36:43 PST 2008
On Jan 25, 2008 1:50 AM, Brian <bri at brianwhalen.net> wrote:
> Hmm, 2 queries here.
>
> 1-wonder how much more gain would be gotten by using a speedy flash
> drive for the ccache folder.
Actually you get the opposite. Here are my results with a USB 2.0 flash drive:
cache directory /mnt/.ccache
cache hit 12106
cache miss 12
called for link 461
multiple source files 1
not a C/C++ file 1228
unsupported compiler option 7
files in cache 122144
cache size 820.2 Mbytes
max cache size 2.0 Gbytes
2h7m4.56s real 31m36.79s user 15m31.80s sys
For reference, I've again rebuilt world and kernel. Ccache stats were
the same as for the flash drive, but here's the time:
47m26.34s real 27m16.22s user 13m45.71s sys
Flash drive is better than nothing at all, but much worse than using a
hard drive.
> 2-I'm wondering about dependencies, like a change in x requires a
> recompile of y, but y doesnt look any different, is this smart enough to
> rebuild based on the dependency?
>
> Brian
What do you mean by "y doesn't look any different"? If recompiling y
results in the same object file, then there is no need to recompile
it. That's all that ccache does. It considers all the variables that
can possibly affect the contents of an object file. If those variables
are the same as from a previously-cached run, then it returns the
precompiled version of the file. More info is available at the ccache
website: http://ccache.samba.org/
- Max
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list