kline at thought.org
Tue Feb 19 20:26:39 UTC 2008
On Tuesday 19 February 2008 08:16:57 Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 09:20:47AM -0500, William Bulley wrote:
> > According to Tim Daneliuk <tundra at tundraware.com>:
> > > Before you go down this road too far, you should take a look at Python
> > > as an implementation language. If what you're doing involves text and
> > > string manipulation, Python is loaded with good modules that will make
> > > your task a snap. Having coded extensively in many assemblers, C,
> > > BASIC, ... I now find myself reaching exclusively for Python when
> > > writing applications and utilities unless the task at hand must have
> > > the performance of native C. Try it ... you'll be shocked how fast
> > > your program comes together.
> > Might the same not be said for Perl?
> Yes . . . and Ruby. I prefer both over Python, for different reasons,
Gotta laugh at most of this considering that I understand that we tend to
favor what we're most familiar with. I've been lazing along for several
years since I've gone back to school--sort of. During my last lifetime I
was trapped into learning perl and forced myself to get into C++ because
much of my work required these languages.
Can you guys, or anybody else, point me to some comparison sites for python
and ruby? I just found one abandoned freeware suite in ruby that may be just
what I'm trying to do. The deal is: do I want to invest months (from 2 to 3)
in learning another language/ or port from ruby to C? or take the Java
functions and re-write or translate them to C?
Still, first thing is to get the algorithm down and tested.
Gary Kline kline at thought.org www.thought.org Public Service Unix
More information about the freebsd-questions