not found, required by "evolution"

Gerard gerard at
Sun Feb 10 20:54:06 UTC 2008

On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 20:37:54 +0000
Chris Whitehouse <cwhiteh at> wrote:


> portmanager -s only lists what needs to be done, it doesn't change 
> anything. It shows which packages are up to date, which are out of
> date, which are current but have been built with out of date
> dependencies, which are missing etc.

There is a slight problem with that however. It only displays what it
believes to be correct at the time it is run. In real life, if
portmanager is run and actually starts to update files, it may
occasionally create a new situation in which other, previously
undisclosed files are now required to be updated to complete the
process correctly. This is where I believe portupgrade fails. I may be
wrong on this; however, I believe that portmanager recalculates
dependencies, etc. after each build. Portupgrade, as far as I can tell,
simply does one pass and that is it. I usually run portupgrade, since
it is quicker; however, when I want to be absolutely sure that
everything is up-to-date, correct dependencies, etc, I run portmanager.

Just my 2¢.


gerard at

QOTD: "The only easy way to tell a hamster from a gerbil is that the
gerbil has more dark meat."

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :

More information about the freebsd-questions mailing list