Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors
perrin at apotheon.com
Mon Dec 15 12:23:50 PST 2008
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 12:53:01PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >That might be a valid concern if your notion of "off topic" didn't
> >include things that pretty much everyone else seems to think is on topic
> >enough to fit into this list.
> do we have to start deciding what's "on-topic" by voting?
> >>i don't mean moderation like removing one opinions and not others. But
> >>removing off-topic messages, that are 95% now or more.
> >1. When moderation is increased, so too are false positives -- like
> >removing statements of opinion that shouldn't be removed.
> there are always false positives. but everything is better than
> "democracy"=what most say is right is considered right.
I never said we should vote on everything -- you just decided to magic
that up out of thin air. Have fun with that.
> >2. Your idea of "off topic" seems to include stuff relevant to FreeBSD.
> not revelant. will you start support my program just because it can be
> compiled on FreeBSD? it's nonsense.
> so stop supporting third party non-freebsd specific software just because
> it can be compiled under FreeBSD!!
the point: ------------------------>
Chad Perrin [ content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
Quoth Larry Wall: "Just don't create a file called -rf."
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20081215/12981936/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-questions