Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors
perrin at apotheon.com
Sun Dec 7 11:56:02 PST 2008
On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 07:18:08PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >Does anyone know of any recent progress on a 64bit Nvidia Driver?
> >there is mention of progress on this page
> most freebsd users don't need 3D at all, or don't need super-high-speed
> so simply don't use nvidia/ati
That strikes me as short-sighted, narrow-minded, and self-fulfilling.
1. As long as there is not as much support for 3D accelerated graphics
with FreeBSD, people who need 3D accelerated graphics will tend to use
other OSes more often.
2. The fact that you apparently have some kind of zealous hatred of the
idea of FreeBSD on the desktop doesn't mean there are not legitimate
uses for FreeBSD on the desktop -- uses that may even include things
like 3D accelerated graphics. Hell, I get better performance for WoW
using Wine than I do on MS Windows.
3. There are uses for 3D accelerated graphics that don't even include
"desktop" use. Rendering farms come to mind.
The more you say "Most FreeBSD users don't need 3D at all, so just use
something else if you need 3D," and sweep the problem under the rug, the
more likely we are to never have a FreeBSD that offers broad, stable
support for 3D accelerated graphics. I would like it if you'd stop
trying to convince people that my favorite OS shouldn't be improved.
Chad Perrin [ content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
Quoth Henry Spencer: "Those who don't understand Unix are doomed to
reinvent it, poorly."
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20081207/c8d8593a/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-questions