wojtek at wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl
Fri Aug 29 10:24:16 UTC 2008
> at FAT.
>> possibly untrue in Win NT,
> From what I've read, it's a journalling filesytem based on a
i mean FAT partition under NT.
> I see that ext4 the successor to ext3, and which also has extent
> support, has a defragmenter. And it appears to give significant
> increases in read speeds.
still it's something wrong if it needs the defragmenter at all...
UFS do not.
More information about the freebsd-questions