is this for OO-2 for FBSD?
kline at tao.thought.org
Tue Oct 30 15:22:45 PDT 2007
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 01:55:57PM -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 10:11:40AM +0000, Vince wrote:
> > Gary Kline wrote:
> > > I'm in the middle of upgrading some platforms and just caught
> > > OOo_OOG680_m6_source.tar.bz2 (278MB) being downloaded. The port
> > > says that this is OO-2.3, but the build says Ishould have
> > > 11GB of disk and ~2GB of memory.
> > >
> > > I somehow downloaded OO_2.3 as a package on one platform. Does
> > > this make any sense? How many of us have 2 gigs of memory?
> > > Seems more than a biit irrational to me. Or did my
> > > portupgrade -aP grab the wrong port?
> > >
> > I think the problem is that the build does take so long and so much
> > resources that the package updates are a bit scarce. The latest I can
> > see on the mirrors is openoffice.org-2.3.20070910.tbz which doesnt seem
> > to fit the numbering scheme for the openoffice.org-2 port but does fit
> > openoffice.org-2-RC which seems a bit odd. I would probably just get the
> > latest package from the openoffice package site
> > (ftp://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/FreeBSD/2.3.0/i386/FreeBSD6)
> > and upgrade manually. As a 7.0 user I had to build my own which took a
> > while.
> Thanks foe thr ftp. I'll see if I can grab it?
Update: lynx is the better tool for this kind of job. Looks like
after several hours I'll move up a couple of OOo releases. ....
Gary Kline kline at thought.org www.thought.org Public Service Unix
More information about the freebsd-questions