Best remote backup method?
youshi10 at u.washington.edu
youshi10 at u.washington.edu
Wed May 16 20:44:05 UTC 2007
On Wed, 16 May 2007, Roland Smith wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 01:38:13PM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote:
>> I'm presently backing up two servers in a remote location to a usb drive
>> located elsewhere by using rsync over ssh (all three are FreeBSD boxes.)
>> After the recent discussion about dump, I'm wondering if I would gain
>> anything by using dump rather than rsync. Has anyone used both? Any
>> thoughts as to which is "better" and why?
>>
>> The rsync command I use is:
>> rsync -avz ${LOCALDIR} -e "ssh -i ${KEY}" ${REMOTEHOST}:${REMOTEDIR}
>
> With dumps it is easier to keep different ones around. If you rsync a
> directory, all previous changes are lost. If you rsync to a different
> directory every time to keep different versions, you might as well use
> tar, because rsync won't save a lot of space/time in that case. And dump
> will backup all ufs2 features such as flags and acls. I'm not sure if
> rsync can manage that. It's also easy to compress dumps, which can save
> a lot of space.
Tar is expensive time-wise anyhow after a while if you use compression.
Also, rsync does diffs on files, which can become expensive in terms of time.
-Garrett
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list