Linux "equivalent" to freebsd
bram at diomedia.be
Sat Mar 3 10:17:22 UTC 2007
I'm not really pro-linux and I really like freebsd but if have to use
linux (because I need things not available on bsd).
I always use fedora, it's fast to install lot's of info on the net and
it is not time consuming (1 hour to install).
Danny Pansters schreef:
> If you have a (Free)BSD mindset and like your rc.conf but don't mind
> typing "pacman" instead of pkg_* or portupgrade -P * and you don't mind using
> something called ABS for src packages, which is like ports, only with a stage
> install before live-system install, then you may just like ArchLinux.
> I tried many but besides Debian, Arch is the only one I really enjoyed toying
> with. Haven't used Arch on serious production system, but it appears that
> other people do. Gentoo is nice (and keeps you busy/entertained) until it
> blows up on you.
> Just my 0.02 as a long time FreeBSD user. The linux I used most was Debian but
> that was long ago before I landed at BSD.
> freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
More information about the freebsd-questions