UFS(2, 3 ?) vs ZFS.
Hugo Silva
hugo at barafranca.com
Wed Jun 20 17:24:19 UTC 2007
Tom Evans wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 21:49 +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>
>>>> UFS and future derivatives are here to stay.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Yeah, but you know because of how nice ZFS is, a concept of using ZFS
>>> for /home and UFS for everything else will probably turn into a
>>>
>> if ZFS will really be so nice i will be making small (50MB) partition for
>> /boot files, ZFS on rest.
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>>
>
> 50MB ? Asking for trouble that is. All I've got is a debug kernel, and a
> backup..
>
> $ du -sh /boot
> 174M /boot
>
>
22K /boot/defaults
2.0K /boot/firmware
20M /boot/kernel
7.8M /boot/modules
4.0K /boot/zfs
20M /boot/kernel.old
20M /boot/kernel.works
68M /boot/
68M total
Keeping porn on /boot ? So unorthodox! :-)
Hugo
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list