UFS(2, 3 ?) vs ZFS.

[Kris Kennaway]

On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 06:51:31PM +0200, Albert Shih wrote:
> Hi all
> 
> Anyone known what's the futur of ufs2 ? Is there any plan to make a ufs3
> for very large FS (> 2TB) . Or the plan is to use classic ufs for /  & /usr and lets
> use ZFS for /home 

ZFS will remain an optional alternative because of the licensing, so
UFS and future derivatives are here to stay.

UFS2 does not have problems with creating filesystems >2TB so there is
no need for a UFS3 on that account.

Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20070615/0ea566e7/attachment.pgp