Advice on which FreeBSD firewall package to choose.
m.seaman at infracaninophile.co.uk
Fri Jan 5 08:37:32 UTC 2007
Atom Powers wrote:
> On 1/4/07, Eric <heli at mikestammer.com> wrote:
>> Brett Davidson wrote:
>> > Before I start, I'm familiar with IPTables from Linux but am wanting to
>> > use FreeBSD as a firewalling router after seeing it in action on a
>> > heavily-loaded webserver. I like the efficiency of the TCP stack.
>> > Upon reading the handbook I found that I can have my choice of three
>> > firewalls; pf, iptables and ipfw.
>> > Against prudence, they wish to allow torrent connections to the inside
>> > lan and ICQ connections to both the Inside LAN and the Wireless DMZ.
>> > torrent and ICQ connections will need to be bandwidth-managed so
>> that is
>> > a major consideration for the choice of which firewall to use. Is there
>> > an equivalent to HTB on FreeBSD?
>> i believe pf is the most modern and cleanest/easiest syntax to use. it
>> is actively developed and lots of people use it. You can set up priority
>> on bandwidth in pf as well, so it should meet all your requirements
> pf will also do the bandwidth management you want. I've used ipfw,
> ipf, iptables, and pf; pf is by far the most powerful and easy to use.
I also heartily endorse the use of pf. However be aware that if you
want to use the QoS and other bandwidth management features you will
need to compile yourself a custom kernel with the appropriate ALTQ
stuff turned on. Unfortunately ALTQ is not currently available as a
loadable module. Compiling a new kernel is not particularly difficult
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
Kent, CT11 9PW
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 250 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20070105/52f41b2a/signature.pgp
More information about the freebsd-questions