Portsnap -- update claims "up to date" but it's not.
Dan Mahoney, System Admin
danm at prime.gushi.org
Tue Dec 25 22:39:29 PST 2007
On Tue, 25 Dec 2007, Jay Chandler wrote:
> Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
>> Maybe I'm just doing this completely wrong:
>>
>> prime# portsnap update
>> Ports tree is already up to date.
>> prime# portsnap fetch
>> Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 4 mirrors found.
>> Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap3.FreeBSD.org... done.
>> Fetching snapshot metadata... done.
>> Updating from Mon Nov 12 18:16:16 EST 2007 to Tue Dec 25 21:36:54 EST 2007.
>> Fetching 4 metadata patches... done.
>> Applying metadata patches... done.
>> Fetching 4 metadata files...
>> [and so on]
>>
>> Am I using this thing wrong?
>>
>> -Dan
>
> Yup. 'portsnap fetch update' is the command I use-- the reverse order that
> you're using 'em in.
Shouldn't I just need one of the two?
-Dan
--
"You can't call yourself a dork if you don't use UNIX!"
-Dan Mahoney, May 1997
--------Dan Mahoney--------
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM
Site: http://www.gushi.org
---------------------------
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list