Understand process priority
ertr1013 at student.uu.se
Sat Dec 22 23:40:54 PST 2007
On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 07:09:47PM -0800, Unga wrote:
> Hi all
> $ ps -o pri,ni,rtprio,command -p `pgrep amarok`
> PRI NI RTPRIO COMMAND
> 20 0 normal amarokapp
> 1) Are there are 3 priority values per process, or
> just one?
There is really only one priority that is used when scheduling
processes. The other two fields (nice and rtprio) modifies how
the priority is set, but do not directly affect the priority.
The actual priority is handled internally in the kernel and cannot
be modified directly from userland.
It is always the case that if two (or more) processes both want
to use the CPU at the same time, then it is the one with the highest
priority which gets to use it.
(The term 'highest priority' can be slightly confusing, since it is normally
the process with the lowest value in the 'PRI' field which has the highest
For those processes that has a real time priority (rtprio) of 'normal',
i.e. most normal processes, the priority is adjusted dynamically
depending on how long it has waited for CPU, and how much CPU it used the
last time it ran, etc. The 'nice' value affects how quickly the priority
is adjusted up or down. A high nice value means that the priority will
only increase slowly and decrease quickly, while it is the other way around
for processes with a low nice value.
Note however that even a process with a high nice value will get at least a
little CPU time now and then, even if there are processes around that are
much less nice that want the CPU too.
For processes with a real time priority of something other than 'normal' the
priority is not adjusted dynamically.
Processes with rtprio=idle always have lower priority than all other
Processes with an actual real time priority set will always have higher
priority than non-real time processes.
> 2) How should I read above? Is it Priority=20, ie.
> NI=0, RTPRIO=normal?
It is: Priority=20; Nice=0; Real time priority=normal
> Does it all mean the same thing,
> like the bytes=1048576 and KB=1024 and MB=1?
> 3) The rtprio(1) says "Priority is an integer between
> 0 and RTP_PRIO_MAX (usually 31). 0 is the highest
> priority". But when I run following command:
> $ ps aux -o pri,ni,rtprio,command
> USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TT STAT STARTED
> TIME COMMAND PRI NI RTPRIO COMMAND
> root 10 99.2 0.0 0 8 ?? RL 7:40PM
> 0:00.00 [idle: cpu1] 171 0 idle:25 [idle: cpu1]
> root 26 0.0 0.0 0 8 ?? WL 7:40PM
> 0:00.02 [irq18: envy24ht -80 0 intr:4 [irq18:
> test 1212 0.0 9.3 58544 48176 ?? S 8:06PM
> 0:06.15 amarokapp 20 0 normal amarokapp
> That is,
> PID PRI NI RTPRIO
> 10 171 0 idle:25
> 26 -80 0 intr:4
> 1212 20 0 normal
> This shows priority ranges at least from -80 to 171
> contrary to the range mentioned in rtprio(1). Does
> this means PID=26 has a higher priority than PID=1212?
rtprio(1) does not set the PRI field directly. It sets the RTPRIO
field. In your example these are 'idle:25' 'intr:4' and 'normal'
indicating that these are run with idle priority, interrupt priority,
and normal priority respectively. (The 'intr' value in the rtprio field
can probably only be set directly by the kernel for interrupt threads, and
is a bit outside the normal real time priorities.)
The actual idel/real time priority value set by rtprio(1)/idprio(1) is not
displayed by ps(1), but can be shown by rtprio(1)/idprio(1).
Yes, PID=26 has a much higher priority than PID=1212, as it should
considering that PID=26 is an interrupt thread, while PID=1212 is just
an ordinary, non-real time, process.
> 4) Can a PRI=0 be considered Realtime?
No, not really. If a process does not have rtprio set to something
other than 'normal' or 'idle' it is not a real time process.
> 5) What is the meaning of priority=0 in
> /etc/login.conf? Is it Realtime?
No, the 'priority' field in /etc/login.conf sets the nice value.
> 6) What is the value should I set for priority in
> /etc/login.conf if I want Realtime?
You can't do that.
You should also not set any process to a real-time priority unless
you know exactly what you are doing and why you are doing it.
The normal way of setting the relative priorities of processes on Unix
systems is by setting the nice value (and only root is allowed to lower the
<Insert your favourite quote here.>
ertr1013 at student.uu.se
More information about the freebsd-questions