Quick perl ports question

[Kurt Buff]

On 8/29/07, Matthew Seaman <m.seaman at infracaninophile.co.uk> wrote:
> Nikola Lecic wrote:
>
> > C) port it!
> >
> > is the best. :) Seriously, if you really have a long term need for
> > Net::LDAP module, then porting would be the most convenient for you and
> > for others.
>
> It's already been done.  I don't know why the port is called
> p5-perl-ldap instead of p5-Net-LDAP though.  Possibly it pre-dates
> the current naming conventions.
>
>         Cheers,
>
>         Matthew

Ah, thanks so very much. It's option D) - the comfy chair! :)

Kurt