dump -L

cpghost cpghost at cordula.ws
Mon Aug 6 04:02:38 PDT 2007


On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 02:18:57PM +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote:
> > > > I always use "dump -L" to dump a live filesystem.
> > > > However, when I restore the dump, I sometimes get messages like
> > > > "foo.txt (inode 12345) not found on tape" or
> > > > "expected next file 12345, got 23456"
> > > >
> > > > I thought this should _never_ happen when dumping a snapshot.
> > > >
> > > > What is it?
> > >
> > > Does nobody know the answer, or am I the only one experiencing the
> > > problem?
> > 
> > I don't know the answer, but I get essentially the
> > same behaviour.  I have never seen any data loss,
> 
> I gave an example below. The file "wins.dat" was not dumped. It is
> indeed missing from the tape.
> 
> If this is not a data loss, what is it then?
> 
> [root at big ~] restore -b64 -rN
> ./spool/samba.lock/wins.dat: (inode 2829098) not found on tape
> expected next file 267, got 4
> expected next file 2828988, got 2828987

Uh-oh :-(. I have no idea how the code works, but just a wild guess:
what happens when a file is being created and a snapshot taken at the
same time? Isn't there a tiny window between inode creation and
directory update? Or is file creation an atomic operation w.r.t.
snapshots and dump?

> Victor Sudakov,  VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN
> sip:sudakov at sibptus.tomsk.ru

Regards,
-cpghost.

-- 
Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/


More information about the freebsd-questions mailing list