solaris

[Jona Joachim]

White Hat wrote:
> --- Freminlins <freminlins at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 06/09/06, White Hat <pigskin_referee at yahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>>>  I have
>>> tried Open Office. No matter what anyone says, it
>> is
>>> just not as full featured as Word 2003. It is not
>> even
>>> close.
>>
>> True, but also compare the cost. Not even close...
> 
> Immaterial. the singularly most important feature is
> suitability to task. If it is free and it does not
> work, what good is it?

What feature(s) exactly do you need that OpenOffice doesn't have?
In what way is MS Office better concerning this (these) feature(s)?

--jona