SATA Raid (stress test..)
Alex Zbyslaw
xfb52 at dial.pipex.com
Fri Mar 3 03:10:57 PST 2006
Nikolas Britton wrote:
>>Please can you be careful when you attribute your comments. You've sent
>>this email "to" me, and left only my name in the attributions as if I
>>were someone suggesting either dd or diskinfo as accurate benchmarks,
>>when in fact my contribution was to suggest unixbench and sandra-lite.
>>Maybe you hate those too, in which case you can quote what I said
>>in-context and rubbish that at your pleasure.
>>
>>
>
>Yes I see your point, it does look like I'm replying to something you
>wrote. This was a oversight and I am sorry.
>
>
OK.
>Remember that 105MB/s number I quoted above?, that's just the
>sustained read transfer rate for a big ass file, I don't need to work
>with big ass files. I need to work with 15MB files (+/- 5MB). After
>buying the right disks, controller, mainboard etc. and lots of tuning
>with the help of iozone I get: 200 - 350MB/s overall (read, write,
>etc.) for files less then or equal to 64MB*.
>
>So anyways, that's what iozone can do for you. google it and you'll
>find out more stuff about it.
>
>
Thanks for the info. I think I can only dream about numbers like like
yours. Iozone looks to be in the ports so I see some of my weekend
disappearing looking at it :-)
Best,
--Alex
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list