"Hostile" vs. "Friendly" instances of Sendmail
derek at computinginnovations.com
Fri Aug 25 20:04:06 UTC 2006
Use MailScanner and configure it to use blacklists and to delete not bounce
At 02:57 PM 8/25/2006, Brett Glass wrote:
>A company for whom I do consulting has a FreeBSD mail server. Because
>they're being deluged with connections from spammers (who have responded
>to the increasing use of "graylisting" by ordering their armies of bots to
>try again and again even when spam is rejected), they've subscribed to
>some DNS blacklists and set Sendmail to limit the number of processes it
>can spawn at any one time. This reduces the load on the system due to
>spamming, but also prevents internal users from getting the mail server's
>attention when they want to send legitimate outgoing mail.
>What's the best way to set things up so that more trusted, internal users
>can access their own instance of Sendmail (with less restrictive process
>limits, no blacklist checks, etc.) while the outside world sees an
>instance of Sendmail with blacklisting, process limits, connection limits,
>load limits, etc.? Will there be problems with file locking, queues, etc.
>if a third instance of Sendmail is started on a standard FreeBSD install
>(which normally runs two)? And where's the option that tells Sendmail to
>listen only on a particular interface? (This should be on the man page,
>freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>This message has been scanned for viruses and
>dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>believed to be clean.
>MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support.
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support.
More information about the freebsd-questions