maxsec at gmail.com
Sun Aug 6 20:23:33 UTC 2006
OK I stand corrected...
softupdates "reduces" the possibility of having to fsck a filesystem....
On 8/5/06, Freminlins <freminlins at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 05/08/06, Martin Hepworth <maxsec at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Softupdates removes the issue if havinh to fsck filesystems after and
> > unclean umount.....
> No it doesn't. Absolutely not.
> After an unclean shutdown fsck runs in the background. And sometimes it
> can't do that. Here's an example:
> Jul 23 17:54:01 zoe fsck: /dev/amrd0s1g: CANNOT CREATE SNAPSHOT
> /d1/.snap/fsck_snapshot: File too large
> Jul 23 17:54:01 zoe fsck:
> Jul 23 17:54:01 zoe fsck: /dev/amrd0s1g: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN
> fsck MANUALLY.
> The /etc/defaults/rc.conf file has a comment on this too:
> background_fsck="YES" # Attempt to run fsck in the background where
More information about the freebsd-questions