Strange case of filesystem corruption?
Eric Anderson
anderson at centtech.com
Wed Sep 7 11:08:12 PDT 2005
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 10:19:30AM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote:
>
>>Robert Watson wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 6 Sep 2005, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Tuesday 06 September 2005 06:51 am, Robert Watson wrote:
>>>>= Have you recently experienced a system crash or hard reboot without
>>>>proper
>>>>= shutdown?
>>>>
>>>>According to dmesg.boot, this filesystem was flagged as "not properly
>>>>dismounted" back then. The machine's uptime is currently 47 days and
>>>>no background fskcs are running, of course.
>>>>
>>>>Yours analysis is, likely, correct then... I guess, the fix should be
>>>>MFCed. (What about 6.0-release?) Thanks!
>>>
>>>
>>>The change was made in HEAD before the 6.x branch, so it's currently in
>>>RELENG_6. I fired off an e-mail to Kirk to ask about MFC'ing it to
>>>RELENG_5, and will do so once I hear back, assuming he thinks there is
>>>no reason not to.
>>>
>>>Do you have back logs to when bgfsck was running, btw? Normally it
>>>should correct this sort of thing, suggestion that bgfsck exited without
>>>correcting them, which is a little worrying. You may want to boot to
>>>single user and fsck manually...
>>
>>I thought that having background_fsck="NO" in your rc.conf would make
>>the partition get mounted even though it is unclean, and no fsck's would
>>happen (I use this 'feature' right now, since doing bgfsck on a 2TB
>>partition takes about 2 hours just to make the snapshot, which means
>>filesystem activity is suspended for that time).
>
>
> AFAIK, no, this just does a regular old fg fsck.
You are absolutely right! My mistake - I had forgotten I did some other
hacks to ignore those filesystems (so I can fsck manually)!
Too bad the mksnap_ffs is so slow on large (>20GB) partitions.. :(
Thanks for the correction!
Eric
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric Anderson Sr. Systems Administrator Centaur Technology
Anything that works is better than anything that doesn't.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list