so much clock interrupts?!

[Kris Kennaway]

On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 01:09:08AM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >>>No, it's just a consequence of HZ=1000 instead of HZ=100.  I've
> >>
> >>
> >>so why 2000 not 1000?
> >>
> >>2000 on each processor!
> >
> >Technical reasons..anyway, 2000 might look like a large number to you,
> >but it's really not unless you're on a very slow machine (like a 486).
> 
> i'm asking why it's 2000, not 1000.

I don't remember off-hand.  It should be apparent if you look at the
code.

Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20051124/9061ef0c/attachment.bin