SCHED_ULE Scheduler FreeBSD 6 - Release
Russell E. Meek
russell at russellmeek.net
Thu Nov 24 05:16:08 GMT 2005
Kris Kennaway wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 05:11:02PM -0500, Russell Meek wrote:
>
>
>>Is anyone here currently using the *SCHED_ULE* scheduler in a server
>>enviroment, production or non?
>>
>>Pros? Cons?
>>
>>
>
>This question has been asked quite often, so you would have done well
>to research the answer before asking :)
>
>It's slower on the workloads I've tested and is not stable on machines
>with many CPUs (e.g. 12).
>
>Kris
>
>
Kris,
This question has been asked quite often, so you would have done well
to research the answer before asking :)
Shitty remark, not wise to jump to conclusions.
Common Sense would dictate that it would be highly retarded for me to
ask a question that I have not at least ever so slightly attempted to
look into.
so you would have done well to research the answer before asking
I see you agree
google.com/bsd is a trusted friend, however not much out there on
performance states between 4BSD and SCHED_ULE on FreeBSD 6 Release.
It's slower on the workloads I've tested and is not stable on machines
with many CPUs (e.g. 12).
That is all I needed. Thanks again for the response.
Russell
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list