if_bridge interface confuses Windows Small Business Server 2000
work at ashleymoran.me.uk
Wed Nov 16 15:45:37 GMT 2005
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 04:52, Erik Osterholm wrote:
> This should not be necessary with if_bridge. A kernel module must be
> loaded before if_bridge will work, but seems to load automatically
> when creating the bridge interface. Alternatively, if_bridge can be
> compiled into the kernel with the following line:
> device if_bridge
> I've even read where the bridge(4) bridging mode is deprecated. Does
> anyone know if this is accurate?
I'm definitely using if_bridge, not bridge. And I read that bridge is
I'm starting to wonder if it's Small Business Server malfunctioning. Not the
first time we've wanted chuck it out the window!!!
More information about the freebsd-questions