can't build firefox 1.0.4 on 4.10
Tony Shadwick
tshadwick at goinet.com
Thu May 19 05:21:37 PDT 2005
You could install portmanager, use portmanager -u and do excludes on ports
that you suspect might break something else if upgraded.
That, and a portmanager -s will give you a nice view of the state of your
ports tree. Perhaps you'll see something you hadn't caught before?
On Thu, 19 May 2005, Timothy Smith wrote:
> albi wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 19 May 2005 19:54:07 +1000
>> Timothy Smith <timothy at open-networks.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> a very wild guess, perhaps you made your /tmp nosuid and noexec, and now
>>>> compilation fails because of that ?
>>>>
>>>> (for me firefox compiled fine from ports some days ago, firefox-1.0.4,1)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> drwxrwxrwt 9 root wheel 1536 May 19 19:36 tmp
>>>
>>> nope. keep in mind everyone that this is 4.10
>>> there's nothing in /tmp that could be causing this i'm sure. is there
>>> anything i can do to make sure my ports and src tree's are clean besides
>>> make clean?
>>>
>>
>> well, if your /tmp was mounted nosuid and noexec then a make world
>> would also fail
>>
>> i have only 5.4-p1 systems in use (and not really time right now to
>> install 4.10 to try to reproduce this)
>>
>> did you do a :
>> portsclean -C
>> portsclean -D
>> portupgrade -arvy
>>
>>
>>
>>
> isnt' there some upgrade guide i should be reading before doing -ar ? this
> system is very important, and while it doesn't matter if firefox is broken
> for the moment, breaking something like gnome would be a total disaster
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list