kern.ipc.nmbclusters

kalin mintchev kalin at el.net
Wed Mar 16 12:01:07 PST 2005


where else can i ask about this?
i tried bsdforums but still total silence there too...

>
>> Did you check top to see if you even use swap?
>
> yea. very small amount.
> Swap: 2032M Total, 624K Used, 2031M Free
>
>>  I never use swap with
>> 512MB on my desktop.  Read man tuning, around byte 32372.
>
> i did a few times. don't remember which byte was it thought...
>
>> Try netstat
>> -m.
>
> i did. here:
> this was when i send this message originally:
> # netstat -m
> 6138/6832/26624 mbufs in use (current/peak/max):
>         6137 mbufs allocated to data
>         1 mbufs allocated to fragment reassembly queue headers
> 6092/6656/6656 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max)
> 15020 Kbytes allocated to network (75% of mb_map in use)
> 11125 requests for memory denied
> 1 requests for memory delayed
> 0 calls to protocol drain routines
>
> ===================================
>
> this is now:
>
> netstat -m
> 349/6832/26624 mbufs in use (current/peak/max):
>         348 mbufs allocated to data
>         1 mbufs allocated to fragment reassembly queue headers
> 346/6656/6656 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max)
> 15020 Kbytes allocated to network (75% of mb_map in use)
> 11125 requests for memory denied
> 1 requests for memory delayed
> 0 calls to protocol drain routines
>
>
> huge difference. so i think about 260 lines of netstat -p tcp output like:
>
> tcp4       0  33580  server.http              c68.112.166.214..3307
> FIN_WAIT_1
>
> has to do with all these 6000 clusters. but i'm not sure how. DOS may be?!
> they are all from the same client ip and all of them have much higher
> number for send then received Q's. what does the state FIN_WAIT_1 mean?
> waiting to finish? if so - why it didn't do that for hours and hours. my
> web server keeps connections alive for 10 sec. there isn't much else that
> uses tcp on that machine. the webserver was inaccessile for about 5-10
> min. so my first thought was DOS... "11125 requests for memory denied"
> made it look like it was a DOS...
>
> maybe somebody can explain the relation if any. it'll be appreciated...
>
>
> thanks....
>
>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>>
>
>
> --
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>


--




More information about the freebsd-questions mailing list