fsck errors on a running system that disappear in single-user

[Jerry McAllister]

> 
> Jerry McAllister writes:
> 
> > At least most likely.    There could possibly a real inconsistency,
> > but it would be difficult on a running system to distinguish it 
> > from the artifacts you point out above.
> 
> But a real consistency would presumably persist with an fsck on a system
> in single-user mode, which is (I assume) quiescent, right?

Well, yes, or at least with the file system to be fsck-ed unmounted.

////jerry

> 
> -- 
> Anthony
>