any ideas why these xorg hassles???

[Michael Shultz]

This report relates to a message you sent with the following header fields:

  Message-id: <200503041010.24182.ringworm01 at gmail.com>
  Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 10:10:23 -0800
  From: "Michael C. Shultz" <ringworm01 at gmail.com>
  To: Gary Kline <kline at tao.thought.org>
  Subject: Re: any ideas why these xorg hassles???

Your message cannot be delivered to the following recipients:

  Recipient address: freebsd-questions at freebsd.org
  Reason: Remote SMTP server has rejected address
  Diagnostic code: smtp;554 Service unavailable; Client host
[206.46.252.40] blocked using bl.spamcop.net; Blocked - see
http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?206.46.252.40
  Remote system: dns;mx1.freebsd.org
(TCP|206.46.252.40|32937|216.136.204.125|25) (mx1.FreeBSD.org ESMTP
Postfix [Postfix Rules!])

unnamed


Encapsulated message


 
Re: any ideas why these xorg hassles???
 


From: 
"Michael C. Shultz" <ringworm01 at gmail.com>


To: 
Gary Kline <kline at tao.thought.org>


CC: 
freebsd-questions at freebsd.org


Date: 
Today 10:10:23 am


On Friday 04 March 2005 10:03 am, you wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 02:38:28AM -0800, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
> > On Friday 04 March 2005 01:52 am, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
>
>       [[ .... ]]
>
> > I have to add one thing, the meta port if installed for the old X
> > version needs to be manually removed first.
>
>       I'm pretty sure I followed UPDATING exactly and just used
>       x11/xorg.  So I type "pkg_delete -f x11/xorg", correct?
>       What about imake-6?  (to get back to -4)?
>
>       gary

pkg_delete -f x11/xorg* is probably better.  Once you do this
just run portmanager -u, after it is finished anything it was unable
to update let me know about.

-Mike